Binding affinity to and dependence on some opioids in Sf9 insect cells expressing human mu-opioid receptor
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the receptor binding affinity and naloxone-precipitated cAMP overshoot of dihydroetorphine, fentanyl, heroin, and pethidine in Sf9 insect cells expressing human mu-opioid receptor (Sf9-mu cells).
METHODS: Competitive binding assay of [3H]ohmefentanyl was used to reveal the affinity for mu-opioid receptor in Sf9-mu cells. [3H]cAMP RIA was used to determine cAMP level. Antinociceptive activity was evaluated using degree 55 mouse hot plate test. Naloxone-precipitated withdrawal jumping was used to reflect physical dependence in mice.
RESULTS: All drugs displayed antinociceptive activity and produced physical dependence in mice. The K(i) values of dihydroetorphine, fentanyl, heroin, and pethidine in competitive binding assay were (0.85+/-0.20) nmol, (59.1+/-11.7) nmol, (0.36+/-0.13) micromol, and (12.2+/-3.8) micromol respectively. The binding affinities of these drugs for mu-opioid receptor in Sf9-mu cells were paralleled to their antinociceptive activities in mice. After chronic pretreatment with these drugs, naloxone induced cAMP withdrawal overshoot in Sf9-mu cells. The dependence index in Sf9-mu cells was calculated as K(i) value in competitive binding assay over EC(50) value in naloxone-precipitated cAMP assay. The physical dependence index in mice was calculated as antinociceptive ED(50)/withdrawal jumping cumulative ED(50). There was a good linear correlation between dependence index in Sf9-mu cells and physical dependence index in mice.
CONCLUSION: The Sf9-mu cells could be used as a cell model to evaluate the receptor binding affinity and physical dependent liability of analgesic agents.
Keywords:
METHODS: Competitive binding assay of [3H]ohmefentanyl was used to reveal the affinity for mu-opioid receptor in Sf9-mu cells. [3H]cAMP RIA was used to determine cAMP level. Antinociceptive activity was evaluated using degree 55 mouse hot plate test. Naloxone-precipitated withdrawal jumping was used to reflect physical dependence in mice.
RESULTS: All drugs displayed antinociceptive activity and produced physical dependence in mice. The K(i) values of dihydroetorphine, fentanyl, heroin, and pethidine in competitive binding assay were (0.85+/-0.20) nmol, (59.1+/-11.7) nmol, (0.36+/-0.13) micromol, and (12.2+/-3.8) micromol respectively. The binding affinities of these drugs for mu-opioid receptor in Sf9-mu cells were paralleled to their antinociceptive activities in mice. After chronic pretreatment with these drugs, naloxone induced cAMP withdrawal overshoot in Sf9-mu cells. The dependence index in Sf9-mu cells was calculated as K(i) value in competitive binding assay over EC(50) value in naloxone-precipitated cAMP assay. The physical dependence index in mice was calculated as antinociceptive ED(50)/withdrawal jumping cumulative ED(50). There was a good linear correlation between dependence index in Sf9-mu cells and physical dependence index in mice.
CONCLUSION: The Sf9-mu cells could be used as a cell model to evaluate the receptor binding affinity and physical dependent liability of analgesic agents.